Are Bridges Just Multi-Sigs?

Arjun discussed the security standards of messaging protocols and Omni’s architecture with Austin King, co-founder of Omni.

Key Takeaways

• Bridge Security Concerns: Messaging protocols and bridges face vulnerabilities, with many still relying on brittle multi-sig arrangements, which present significant security risks.

• Restaking and ZK Proofs: Restaking and zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) are possible ways to make bridge security better, but they are taking too long to be put into practice, especially because there are not any slashing mechanisms for restaking.

• Intent-Based Systems vs. Messaging Protocols: Intent-based systems offer faster transactions by using external liquidity, while messaging protocols focus on ensuring secure cross-chain communication.

• Hybrid Security Models: A combination of intent-based systems for faster transactions and messaging protocols for security might be the way forward.

• Looking Ahead: There's a push for stronger security as new methods are developed. However, it's crucial to continue improving current bridge security while the ecosystem grows.

Summary

Bridge Security and the Multi-Sig Landscape

• A significant portion of bridges, such as Wormhole, continue to use multi-sig setups, which lack slashing mechanisms to penalize dishonest behavior, raising concerns about their security properties.

• Axelar, by contrast, uses a staking system to enhance security through crypto-economic incentives, offering a more secure alternative.

The Role of Restaking and ZK Proofs

• Restaking and ZK proofs are promising approaches for strengthening bridge security, though the slow rollout of slashing for restaking has hindered their full potential.

• Despite the delay, these methods hold promise for increasing security in cross-chain communication.

Balancing Intent-Based Systems and Messaging Protocols

• Intent-based systems are emerging as a faster alternative to traditional messaging protocols by using external liquidity to complete transactions more quickly. However, messaging protocols still provide greater security.

• Combining the speed of intent-based systems with the security of messaging protocols might offer a balanced solution for the future.

For more details, tune into the full conversation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o4bRgkpHI8

Get Started With LI.FI Today

Enjoyed reading our research? To learn more about us:

• Head to our link portal at link3.to
• Read our SDK ‘quick start’ at docs.li.fi
• Subscribe to our newsletter on Substack
• Follow our Telegram Newsletter
• Follow us on X & LinkedIn

Disclaimer: This article is only meant for informational purposes. The projects mentioned in the article are our partners, but we encourage you to do your due diligence before using or buying tokens of any protocol mentioned. This is not financial advice.